g/acc? WACK! g/acc? WACK!
Now Moleson why the hell is you talking about g/acc. Besides, possibly u/acc isn’t acc essentially dead? Like cmon Moleson most people are become adults why is accelerationism being brought up.
The answer to this question is TERFs. On degenerate Anglo barbarian Island TERFs found out about the Blackpaper. Now when you hear the term “Blackpaper” you’re wondering to yourself “man what have Italians gone up to” but this isn’t some Italian National Liberation Article, it’s instead referring to a paper on “gender accelerationism”.
So Moleson, the hell is gender accelerationism? Usually, theorycels when asked this either:
a) rant about which french pedophile was the coolest
b) talk about the recent banger substack article written about Cole R. Moleson.
c) actually give you a decent answer (it’s about slime 5head)
However, I am not a theorycel. I am instead a straight man.
So to answer the question “what is gender accelerationism” it is basically an offshoot of xenofeminism (probably idk as I’ve said I am a straight man) and accelerationism.
With that aside let us now make fun of this paper.
Now I must say why did this Italian spend the first two sections of the blackpaper talking about computers. I must ask did the Soviet Union use Gosplan or Ogas? Gosplan.
Techno cucks 0 Moleson Infinity.
Also, they mention how most computer scientists and programmers were women or hyper-feminine men. However, I must say if we take two political streamers one who is masculine and one who is feminine"? Let’s say Infrared Haz and Vaush who is better? Infrared Haz. Haz is clearly more masculine than Vaush
Femcels 0 Moleson Infinity.
The first two sections are really nothing of importance. I’m not a nerd and I already debunked big computers so I won’t be going too deep. However the next section “The Hypersexist Gender Shredder” is a doozy.
When I read this I said to myself “who told Trans women about Ryan Faulk and race realism”? Basically, the author is saying that trans women, specifically trans women who are attracted to other women, have higher IQs (and like every good person who cares about IQs their sources are of course other obscure blogs). They have some schizo theory on why this happens.
To quote the Italian:
“On the one hand, trans women who transition before puberty and who are straight are more likely to both physically appear more like cis women and also conform to gender roles in at least some basic capacity (being attracted to men). As Land says in “Imitation Games”, “You have to act stupid if you want the humans to accept you as intelligent.” Or in other words, you have to be cisheteronormative (read: stupid) in order to be taken seriously as a trans woman, and not be looked at as a freak or a faker worthy only of being used shamefully as a fetish, and often otherwise discarded. Which is why, in the second case, trans women who don’t have the advantage of being cisheteronormative-passing have to instead rely on the raw intellect of the trans-AI swarm.”
Right total wacky shit? Now besides the fact that we’re just throwing out race, culture, religion, economic status, etc. in this analysis which can pretty just clown on these subjects.
“Uh, why do white people on average have typically higher IQs than black people”?
“Because AI 5head”.
They also promote a concept known as “hyper-sexism”. Basically just the neo-reactionary concept of hyper-racism but like for gender. Now in a sense, I am a “hyper-sexist” because after reading this I think all lesbian trans women should never be allowed to write if this is what they will produce.
The last thing I’ll mention in this section is their thoughts on masculinity. To sum it up they’re basically saying that masculinity is coming to an end and feminity is replacing it. My response is this.
Who made Baker 3? Men or women. Men
Who made Yeezus? Men or women. Men
Who made Red Bull? Men or women. Men
Now name me one thing lesbian trans women have done that compares to this. I will wait.
I rest my case.
I could’ve gone into who the idea of “masculinity” and “feminity” being both useless terms, I could’ve gone into the fact that the author pretty much sidesteps race, religion, economic status, culture, etc. I could’ve gone into the fact that while the author treats feminity as something that is socially constructed while also treating it like a divine principle that transcends everything and has existed since that dumb fucking fish went on land. Hell, I could’ve gotten into the fact that setting up women against men while somehow believing that it’ll destroy the gender binary. Also, the fact that women (even lesbian trans women) are the same (pedophile Kamala Harris and some women in Jordan with 12 children are both “oppressed” in the same way). We’re not even going to mention how Land doesn’t even talk about this gay shit why is Moleson talking about it!!!!
I will not comment on this dumpster fire anymore I will leave two quotes.
1) As Cosmo from The Fairly OddParents once said “you’re a girl now who cares what you think”.
2) As Black Nationalist Based King Nick once said “white women must be stopped”!
TLDR: femcels stay losing embrace the Moleosn age Mindest.
Banger article Mr. Moleson
Moleson has published yet another article filled with nothing but right-wing deviationism. Sad!